if we get empty brushes in CSG subtract, don't complain, just don't insert the new brush (as this can happen intentionally when a brush is entirely covered)
This commit is contained in:
parent
277c57b2db
commit
5b8b0dd6b2
|
|
@ -397,13 +397,17 @@ public:
|
|||
for(brush_vector_t::const_iterator i = out.begin(); i != out.end(); ++i)
|
||||
{
|
||||
++m_after;
|
||||
NodeSmartReference node((new BrushNode())->node());
|
||||
(*i)->removeEmptyFaces();
|
||||
ASSERT_MESSAGE(!(*i)->empty(), "brush left with no faces after subtract");
|
||||
if(!(*i)->empty())
|
||||
{
|
||||
NodeSmartReference node((new BrushNode())->node());
|
||||
Node_getBrush(node)->copy(*(*i));
|
||||
delete (*i);
|
||||
Node_getTraversable(path.parent())->insert(node);
|
||||
}
|
||||
else
|
||||
delete (*i);
|
||||
}
|
||||
Path_deleteTop(path);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user